I’m sure it is very easy for entrepreneurs and manufacturers to come up with a device – call it “hoopulator” – which a student can use in the gym to precision-shoot a basketball into the hoop. It certainly makes the job of the physical education instructors a lot easier! Why has no one even thought of inventing such a thing? Is it perhaps because it defeats the purpose of playing basketball, namely developing skills that improve bodily activity? … And if used, it makes students’ bodies lazy and unfit?

Don’t calculators and computers **used at an early stage** have the same effect of making the brain lazy and unfit? Is the “mental” activity involved in punching buttons of a calculator of the same kind as going through the mathematical/algebraic process mentally? Technology-driven teachers use calculators even in elementary schools in place of having the kids learn multiplication table – I’ve heard complaints from teachers that many high school students don’t know the multiplication table. Knowing multiplication table enables students to do long multiplication and division, **which do to the brain what playing basketball** (or any other sport) **does to the body**. Furthermore,

If students don’t know the multiplication table, they cannot master algebra.

So, technology persuades teachers to relegate algebraic skills to more advanced calculators!

If students don’t know algebra, they cannot master calculus.

So, differentiation, integration, and all the other necessary skills of calculus are relegated to TI-89!

If students don’t know calculus, they cannot master differential equations.

So, differential equations is relegated to computer algebra programs!

When does the brain of a student start to work mathematically? If we replace teaching our students how to **understand** math with how to punch buttons or press keys, will they **EVER** learn to **THINK**? Will any of these students have a chance to become a **creative** mathematician or scientist?

Teaching STEM –and pretty much everything else- in a system controlled at the top by social “scientists” is practically impossible. They have imposed the dogma that teaching “skills” instead of transmitting knowledge should be the basis for education. It seems to me (I admit it may sound a bit prejudiced) that their contempt for knowledge arises from their experience within their own professions, where knowledge is basically fluff. They have arrived to the conclusion (true in their own world) that knowledge of facts is pointless. Well, that is not so for the multiplication tables, geometric theorems developed in the 4th century BC, the list of kings of England, and many other facts and theories.

I agree completely with your statement about social “scientists” controlling STEM education. I also agree that they label scientific, geometric, and mathematical KNOWLEDGE as facts to be memorized, and since memorization is a four-letter word, they ban that kind of knowledge. In the US, they don’t use “skill.” In fact, they are vehemently against the word as it connotes “rote” repetition. They use the word “process” for scientific learning: as long as students “try” learning, they are in the “process” of learning, regardless of the end result of that process, and therefore, they should be given pass credit for the course!

Please let me know if you’re looking for a writer for your blog.

You have some really good posts and I believe I

would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the

load off, I’d really like to write some articles for your blog in exchange for a link

back to mine. Please shoot me an email if interested.

Regards!

I sent you an email at kandicemackness@gmail.com and received a failure of delivery notice saying that such an email does not exist. Could you contact me privately at samhertzinger@gmail.com with some details of the topics you may write about? Thanks.